Fission yeast 26S proteasome mutants are multi-drug resistant due to stabilization of the pap1 transcription factor

Here we report the result of a genetic screen for mutants resistant to the microtubule poison methyl benzimidazol-2-yl carbamate (MBC) that were also temperature sensitive for growth. In total the isolated mutants were distributed in ten complementation groups. Cloning experiments revealed that most of the mutants were in essential genes encoding various 26S proteasome subunits. We found that the proteasome mutants are multi-drug resistant due to stabilization of the stress-activated transcription factor Pap1. We show that the ubiquitylation and ultimately the degradation of Pap1 depend on the Rhp6/Ubc2 E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme and the Ubr1 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase. Accordingly, mutants lacking Rhp6 or Ubr1 display drug-resistant phenotypes

Modulation of the DNA-binding activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2–MSH6 complex by the high-mobility group protein NHP6A, in vitro

DNA mismatch repair corrects mispaired bases and small insertions/deletions in DNA. In eukaryotes, the mismatch repair complex MSH2–MSH6 binds to mispairs with only slightly higher affinity than to fully paired DNA in vitro. Recently, the high-mobility group box1 protein, (HMGB1), has been shown to stimulate the mismatch repair reaction in vitro. In yeast, the closest homologs of HMGB1 are NHP6A and NHP6B. These proteins have been shown to be required for genome stability maintenance and mutagenesis control. In this work, we show that MSH2–MSH6 and NHP6A modulate their binding to DNA in vitro. Binding of the yeast MSH2–MSH6 to homoduplex regions of DNA significantly stimulates the loading of NHP6A. Upon binding of NHP6A to DNA, MSH2–MSH6 is excluded from binding unless a mismatch is present. A DNA binding-impaired MSH2–MSH6F337A significantly reduced the loading of NHP6A to DNA, suggesting that MSH2–MSH6 binding is a requisite for NHP6A loading. MSH2–MSH6 and NHP6A form a stable complex, which is responsive to ATP on mismatched substrates. These results suggest that MSH2–MSH6 binding to homoduplex regions of DNA recruits NHP6A, which then prevents further binding of MSH2–MSH6 to these sites unless a mismatch is present

Gene expression profiles derived from fine needle aspiration correlate with response to systemic chemotherapy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Drug resistance in breast cancer is a major obstacle to successful chemotherapy. In this study we used cDNA microarray technology to examine gene expression profiles obtained from fine needle aspiration (FNA) of primary breast tumors before and after systemic chemotherapy. Our goal was to determine the feasibility of obtaining representative expression array profiles from limited amounts of tissue and to identify those expression profiles that correlate with treatment response. METHODS: Repeat presurgical FNA samples were taken from six patients who were to undergo primary surgical treatment. Additionally, a group of 10 patients who were to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy underwent two FNAs before chemotherapy (adriamycin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)) followed by another FNA on day 21 after the first cycle. Total RNA was amplified with T7 Eberwine's procedure and labeled cDNA was hybridized onto a 7600-feature glass cDNA microarray. RESULTS: We identified candidate gene expression profiles that might distinguish tumors with complete response to chemotherapy from tumors that do not respond, and found that the number of genes that change after one cycle of chemotherapy was 10 times greater in the responding group than in the non-responding group. CONCLUSION: This study supports the suitability of FNA-derived cDNA microarray expression profiling of breast cancers as a comprehensive genomic approach for studying the mechanisms of drug resistance. Our findings also demonstrate the potential of monitoring post-chemotherapy changes in expression profiles as a measure of pharmacodynamic effect and suggests that these approaches might yield useful results when validated by larger studies

Mechanistic understanding of the temperature dependence of crack growth rate in alloy 600 and 316 stainless steel through high-resolution characterization

Stress corrosion cracking of Alloy 600 (A600) and 316 stainless steel (316SS) exposed to simulated pressurized water reactor primary water at temperatures of 320–360 °C has been investigated and compared. Intergranular oxidation developed ahead of all crack tips prepared from these two alloys. High-resolution characterization reveals that there are two main rate-controlling mechanisms contributing to crack propagation: a diffusion-based and a mechanical deformation-based. The different temperature dependence of crack growth rate (CGR) in A600 and 316SS can be explained after confirming that the two rate-controlling mechanisms exhibit different “weights” in the two alloys. The diffusion-based mechanism plays a dominant role in accelerating the CGR of A600, while the mechanical deformation-based mechanism is responsible for the observed CGR decrease of 316SS at higher temperatures